On Sun, Jul 3, 2011 at 1:07 PM, Paul Davis <[email protected]> wrote: > On Sun, Jul 3, 2011 at 3:59 PM, Devin Anderson <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> I'm curious about what you might have done differently if you knew >> then what you know now. > > what *should* have happened was a plugin API that as many developers > as now use JACK would have agreed to adopt.
I guess the easy thing to say here is that LV2 *could* be that API, but I don't see the same amount of interest in LV2 that there is in JACK. Maybe I'm wrong. > what could have happened was something like JACK. JACK has a lot of useful, non-trivial functionality that isn't going to be found in a plugin API (hardware interfacing, moving audio/MIDI around safely and efficiently, etc.). Perhaps a host API would be just as helpful. > politics is the art of the possible. Indeed. -- Devin Anderson devin (at) charityfinders (dot) com CharityFinders - http://www.charityfinders.com/ synthclone - http://synthclone.googlecode.com/ _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
