On Fri, Nov 4, 2011 at 1:16 PM, Emanuel Rumpf <[email protected]> wrote: > While this is restrictive, in the way you mention, I think it's a > welcome simplification > ( compared to implementing a real-time-capable-linked-list + other > rt-structures ), > if your use-case doesn't require direct calls to the list (for any reason), > then you could request insert/remove/update operations through the > rt-ring-buffer.
you can't perform insert/remove/update operations on a "normal" linked list in an RT thread. _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
