On Fri, Nov 4, 2011 at 10:23 AM, Paul Davis <[email protected]>wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 4, 2011 at 1:16 PM, Emanuel Rumpf <[email protected]> wrote: > > > While this is restrictive, in the way you mention, I think it's a > > welcome simplification > > ( compared to implementing a real-time-capable-linked-list + other > > rt-structures ), > > if your use-case doesn't require direct calls to the list (for any > reason), > > then you could request insert/remove/update operations through the > > rt-ring-buffer. > > you can't perform insert/remove/update operations on a "normal" linked > list in an RT thread. > Sorry, what do you need instead? ( trying hard to absorb all this.. ) thanks iain
_______________________________________________ Linux-audio-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
