On Sat, Nov 19, 2011 at 7:23 PM, Iain Duncan <[email protected]>wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 19, 2011 at 7:19 PM, Paul Davis <[email protected]>wrote: > >> On Sat, Nov 19, 2011 at 10:15 PM, Iain Duncan <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> > Just wondering if I understand this correctly. I making a loop based >> app for >> > step sequencing. When I previously did this in Csound, I clocked it off >> a >> > phasor, so the timing was sample accurate ( but that brought all it's >> own >> > issues to be sure ). I'm wondering whether I should do the same thing in >> > jack app, or use the jack transport clock, or some hybrid. >> >> there was a proposal many (*many*) years ago from jesse chappell that >> fully covered looping with JACK. it was never implemented. as it >> stands, it is not possible to get seamless looping with jack >> transport. in practice it might sound right for a given user with a >> given set of clients, but change any aspect of the configuration and >> it would no longer be seamless. >> > > Also, is that proposal a dead duck now? Seems to me like if it worked, it would be a pretty killer feature given the popularity of the Ableton Live style of working these days. Has anyone else looked into it since then? thanks iain
_______________________________________________ Linux-audio-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
