On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 9:27 AM, Paul Davis <[email protected]>wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 12:26 PM, Iain Duncan <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > Thanks, that clarifies things a lot for me. I didn't think about the disk > > seeking issue. (For my app, my intent is to have everything in RAM for > live > > playing ). Was the intent of the jack looping transport proposal to allow > > clients to know that they were looping and do seamless looping too if > they > > are able? > > yes. > Off the official ardourd-jack roadmap record, do you think there's a realistic chance of this still happening in the next few years? At least for Ardour? I might code such that I can use ardour with it when available if that's in the works because that would be super cool, but I totally get that it may be a very low priority for Ardour dev. iain
_______________________________________________ Linux-audio-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
