Am Sonntag, den 29.04.2012, 11:07 -0400 schrieb Paul Davis: > On Sun, Apr 29, 2012 at 10:41 AM, hermann <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Is anyone here on the list knowing what is to do now, what could we do > > to make the provider aware that he must offer the source in the same way > > then the binary's, > > this part is not quite true. its generally accepted that as long as > the source is freel available from an identifiable online location, > then notifying people who received the binaries of their rights and > the location from which the source can be obtained is sufficient *if > there are no modifications*
But he fail already by notify people of there rights. How could one say if there are modifications ? Anyhow, for sure there is GPL'd software included, witch is modified, and isn't available at a online location. He claim it as a modified slackware "OS" build. _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
