Am Sonntag, den 29.04.2012, 15:44 -0500 schrieb Jan Depner: > On Sun, 2012-04-29 at 11:07 -0400, Paul Davis wrote: > > On Sun, Apr 29, 2012 at 10:41 AM, hermann <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Is anyone here on the list knowing what is to do now, what could we do > > > to make the provider aware that he must offer the source in the same way > > > then the binary's, > > > > this part is not quite true. its generally accepted that as long as > > the source is freel available from an identifiable online location, > > then notifying people who received the binaries of their rights and > > the location from which the source can be obtained is sufficient *if > > there are no modifications* > > I agree with Paul. He's got all of the included package's web site > links on his web site. If you want to duplicate what he's done you can > just jump to all of those links, get all the source code, and build it > yourself. Thirty bucks doesn't sound like too high a price to avoid the > headaches though (assuming it works ;-) > > Jan >
The link list is far away from "all". eg.: libs, kernel, etc. The price is not in question. But I think, if one use GPL'd software commercial, the distributor must make sure that the source is available to the users, I mean the complete source here. This stick is a bit more then a bundle of applications were a link to some project site will suite the requirements of the GPL. hermann _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
