On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 08:24:29AM -0400, Paul Davis wrote: > inevitable, since you are changing the order of processors in the channel > strip. in some setups, you will notice the click as this happens, in others > you will not.
This makes A3 unusable for live work. For the simple reason that nobody expects such a thing to happen, not any more than e.g. using a PFL should cause clicks. I will refrain from mentioning the not-so-kind adjectives that would be used to describe a HW mixer doing such a thing. > i considered a design in which every possible metering point had a "tap" > already in place, but this doesn't work for the "custom" option, hence the > current design. Why shouldn't that work for the custom point ? After all it *is* a 'tap' and not a processor. And even if it is implemented as a processor (with an audio output that downstream depends on), the custom point could just stay in place once created, along with any other metering point, active or not. As a bonus you can at least see were it is, even if not active. ISTR things were like that in earlier releases, but I could be mistaken. Ciao, -- FA A world of exhaustive, reliable metadata would be an utopia. It's also a pipe-dream, founded on self-delusion, nerd hubris and hysterically inflated market opportunities. (Cory Doctorow) _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
