Le Sun, 05 Jan 2014 13:50:52 +0100, Ralf Mardorf <[email protected]> a écrit :
> On Sun, 2014-01-05 at 00:29 +0100, Dominique Michel wrote: > > And classical physics is even worst. In Einstein formula e=mc^2, the > > only term for which we have a definition is c... > > > > For e, it is no definition, only equations which are not definitions > > https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/c/c9/E%3Dmc%C2% > B2-explication.svg/220px-E%3Dmc%C2%B2-explication.svg.png > > The Definition for E is m*c². By your explanation we would als have no > definition for c, since c also is an equation, c is m/s (another m ;). > The only differences are that some values are constants and others are > variables. That's an equation. A definition is with ==, not =. The definition of energy is the capacity to do some work, and as both work and energy share the same unit, the Joule, we get that work is equivalent to energy, as we learn it at school. Maxwell's theory as we learn it at school (which is a truncation of its original 1865 theory made by Heaveside, Herz and Gibbs) doesn't allow things like the Bohren experiment which give us up to 18 times more energy at the output than the input energy. But the fact remain that the Bohren experiment can be reproduced, and have been reproduced. Hopefully, it is other theories slowly emerging like the electrodynamics (O3), Sachs work and the unified field theory of Evans, that mix Maxwell's original theory (which is relativistic) with general relativity, quantum physics, and with new advances like Whitaker EM decomposition and broken symmetry, to get a new theory where coefficient of efficiency > 1 are achievable. The main issue here is money, the one that make big money with the energy are the ones that found most research in that field. More, Maxwell was assuming a material ether, therefore the assumption of EM fields in vacuum, but EM fields just cannot exist without particles. They are not a cause but an effect of the particles: "In my considered opinion I think that a photon is a manifestation of spacetime curvature, the result of quantization of the electromagnetic field tensor in antisymmetrized general relativity." Evans, the author of "The Enigmatic Photon". "A photon is a magnetic dipole. It is an elementary magnet. Evans' discovery of the photon's longitudinal magnetic field in 1992 is as significant, at the quantum level, as Einstein's discovery of relativity at the universal level. It helps to give a physical interpretation to string theory, wave mechanics, two-slit interference and the Faraday effect. A string is a harmonically moving photon that vibrates, oscillates, spins and twists." K. L. Rajpal Among all the vulgarisation that is in Bearden's web site, see http://www.cheniere.org/references/index.htm for references. Dominique > > _______________________________________________ > Linux-audio-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-dev _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
