On Tue, 2014-01-07 at 00:22 +0000, Fons Adriaensen wrote: > On Tue, Jan 07, 2014 at 12:32:02AM +0100, Dominique Michel wrote: > > > ... mainstream physics doesn't validate Evans' theory (as it > > didn't validated Galileo's theory at his time) > > That is one of the most intellectually dishonest analogies I've > seen so far. Galileo's theories were not rejected by fellow > scientist - those who repeated his observations tended to agree. > He was silenced because he undermined the teachings of the > Catholic Church. > > No such thing happened to Evans. His theories were discredited > because his argumentation contained mathematical errors. These > have been published and can be verified by everyone who cares.
Since it seems to continue on the list. I agree with Fons statement, but IMO it's likely that in the future physics will change a lot assumed humans will survive another 2000 years or longer. -------- Forwarded Message -------- From: Ralf Mardorf To: Dominique Michel Subject: [off-list][LAD] Audio Levitation Date: Tue, 07 Jan 2014 16:59:36 +0100 Mailer: Evolution 3.10.3 On Tue, 2014-01-07 at 00:32 +0100, Dominique Michel wrote: > I just say it is other theories today than the one > we learn at school That's true and it even might be that "the law of conservation of energy" someday will be outdated. Nowadays it's just that most, if not all super-ideas are simply nonsense. _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
