On Wed, 2 Sep 2015 21:17:43 +0200 Luis Garrido <l...@vagar.org> wrote:
> On 02/09/15 21:04, Joakim Hernberg wrote: > > > Maybe not a huge problem and I suppose I'll set the latency > > compensation somewhere in the middle of the results, but still I'm > > curious of the mechanism behind this phenomena. > > > > USB devices add some extra buffering, check out this thread: > > http://jack-audio.10948.n7.nabble.com/Differences-in-latency-between-USB-and-internal-audio-interfaces-td9071.html Well yes, I'm aware of that and it was this extra latency that I wanted to ascertain. What puzzles me is that each time the jack server is invoked, it will need a different amount of latency compensation even when no other parameters have changed. I'll read that thread and it's links again, but IIRC they don't hold the answer to my query. -- Joakim _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-dev mailing list Linux-audio-dev@lists.linuxaudio.org http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-dev