On Wed, 2 Sep 2015 23:51:36 +0200 Adrian Knoth <a...@drcomp.erfurt.thur.de> wrote:
> On 09/02/15 21:35, Joakim Hernberg wrote: > > > Well yes, I'm aware of that and it was this extra latency that I > > wanted to ascertain. What puzzles me is that each time the jack > > server is invoked, it will need a different amount of latency > > compensation even when no other parameters have changed. > > Didn't Fons mention a similar problem lately? (think two weeks ago). > > He's currently travelling, but maybe you want to check out his patches > (yet to be posted). > > Note that Fons' patches are only about client execution order in > jackd1. If you also get different values in jackd2, then it's either > unrelated or needs fixing as well. IIRC the problem Fons uncovered had to do with the effective latency changing by one period when clients connected/disconnected. This doesn't appear to be related. And AFAIK it only happens with USB devices. -- Joakim _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-dev mailing list Linux-audio-dev@lists.linuxaudio.org http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-dev