I totally agree. I am so tired of everything being rated to the clock speed of the CPU, which really has no relevence other than comparing it to the same architecture at different speeds. I say we start measuring speed by cost/robust-benchmark :)
Rick > Saying the code runs faster than on an "equivalent" > Intel processor requires that we agree on what > equivalent means, a discussion that I suspect won't > benefit this email list. (Equivalent process > technologies? Equivalent clock rates? Equivalent > aggregate performance? Equivalent product intro dates?) -
