[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Saying the code runs faster than on an "equivalent" > Intel processor requires that we agree on what > equivalent means, a discussion that I suspect won't > benefit this email list. (Equivalent process > technologies? Equivalent clock rates? Equivalent > aggregate performance? Equivalent product intro dates?) -
I meant same clock frequency... :)
- Jussi Laako
--
PGP key fingerprint: 161D 6FED 6A92 39E2 EB5B 39DD A4DE 63EB C216 1E4B
Available at PGP keyservers
