On Fri, Oct 18, 2002 at 12:44:56 +0000, Stefan Nitschke wrote: > >Hmmm... My experiments with c++, dsp code and gcc (recent 2.96) did not > >turn out very well. For some reason the optimiser totaly chokes on c++ > >code. I only tried one routine, and I'm no c++ expert, so its possible I > >screwed something up, but it did not look encouraging. I will revisit this > >and also try gcc3, which has much better c++ support IIRC. > > I think gcc is in general not the best choice when you want to have highly > optimized code. I had no problems with C++ so far. You should avoid to use > pointers when ever possible and use references instead. RTSynth is written > in C++ and it performs quite well i think...
gcc3 actualy makes a good job of C, gcc2 was not so good. - Steve
