Lea Anthony wrote: >On Thu, 2002-10-24 at 01:12, Tim Goetze wrote: >> Lea Anthony wrote: >> >> >Have you guys heard amplitube? Man, those sounds rock! >> >> haven't heard it yet, no. >> >> if you happen to use it, it'd be very interesting to hear >> how much cpu load the different sub-modules generate. > >It's a windows app so I don't know how much extra overhead windows adds >on per submodule. Getting a pure cpu usage for the submodules will be >hard, but an approximation is not much of a problem.
graphics should not be a problem (bitmap blits don't create relevant cpu load on recent systems). a rough figure for the system's total cpu load for every effect running on its own (if that is possible) would be a good start. if you don't run "ms access" or other busy-waiting apps in the background the system part of the cpu load should be negligible. >Also, I must ask this, how much of the LAD stuff is designed with 32bit >audio in mind? I ask because that's what I work in, then dither down to >16bit when mastering. most of what i do is 64 internally and 32 for inter-module exchange. tim
