Serves me right I suppose... have a nice day...
On Sun, 2002-12-08 at 11:28, Tim Hockin wrote: > > I agree with your comments. I'd also like to see the developers at > > least understand and consider these sorts of protocols also. In the end > > something good will come out of it. > > We're not discussing discarding velocity. We're discussing whether it is a > property of the note on/off events, or whether it can be unified with the > rest of the event model and become a simple event delivered at note_on time. > > If a plugin wants to handle continuous velocity changes (a violin?) it can. > It CAN, but it doesn't HAVE TO. That is the markings of a good API, in my > mind, and that is why I have conceded this point :) > > Tim
