On Mon, Dec 09, 2002 at 05:00:43PM +0100, David Olofson wrote: > > Doesnt it make more sense to require imstruments to handle all > > values in the range that they declare as valid? Thats not hard. > > Hmm... Well, yes, but how do you handle these enum controls with > "random" modes that can be disabled depending on the values of other > controls? > > IMHO, such controls would be a sign of bad design, and in that case, > we could basically just rule them out, or rather ignore (*) them - > but I could be missing something.
Yes, I can only think of one example of this (in any plugin system) and it was definalty a case of bad design. - Steve
