On Tue, Feb 04, 2003 at 07:10:39 -0500, Taybin Rutkin wrote: > On Tue, 4 Feb 2003, Abramo Bagnara wrote: > > > Despite that I strongly think that an audio server that not permit in > > native way the traditional approach (what you call blocking approach) > > will never achieve the driving role we'd need. > > Well, given that Ardour, amsynth, alsaplayer, and freqtweak all use jack, > I'm pretty happy with how it is. It doesn't need to gain any more > applications to be considered a success as far as I'm concerned.
I'd say that AMS, SSM, pd and ecasound mark it as a success :) I dont see how nayone could dismiss JACK in this respect, it does one thing (lowlatency synced audio for music creation apps) and it does it very well. - Steve
