On Wed, Feb 05, 2003 at 08:21:06 +0100, David Olofson wrote: > Yeah, that's basically where I'm getting. I don't really like it, > considering what it does to plugin code, but it's not *that* bad, and > it makes life a lot easier. The cost of having hosts do it would be > *much* higher, and you'd basically have to do it all the time, I > think.
OTOH the plugin /should/ be resposible for ensuring that its outputs dont go outside the specifed ranges. Remeber that, i they are allowed at all, hard ranges should be rare. There seems to be a siuggestion in the PTAF document that host may have to be responsibe for killing denormal numbers anyway, so they will have to snoop controls in that case. - Steve
