> On Sat, Feb 08, 2003 at 07:41:43 +0100, David Olofson wrote: > > As a matter of fact, if you just loop the output back to the input, > > the "LEARN" switch is all you need. Whenever you flip the switch to > > "off" the new data would be send back to the input. When you save a > > preset, the host would see the connection of the input and go look > > for the current value - which it finds on that output. > > This is starting to sound like a really nasty hack.
I'm starting to agree. I really dislike the idea that the host has to read a plugin's output control to get extra stuff for a preset. If there really is extra stuff, let's do it properly. I'm not sure yet that there is a need for it, so let's just back-burner it? Tim
