> > I still don't understand how the Linuxaudio.org consortium is > represting anyone but its members (as is the case for all consortia, > which usually don't represent anyone but their own members).
We all want to promote Linux Audio. The question is - what's the best way to do it? As i see it, the term 'linuxaudio' unifies the following: *linux audio developers *linux audio users *linux audio applications/projects We shoudln't further fragment the community by setting up more mailing lists and using a domainname which can act as an entrance or a meeting point for all the 3 mentioned above. The second problem is - protection. OSS software can be easily abused as it's 'naked' so to speak. Having a consortium consisting of companies and projects seems like having both a wolf and a sheep in one bag. Besides it's not clear whether the companies mentioned on the la.org members page have any relation to the applications mentioned on the same page. Marek
