Dave Phillips writes: Hi Dave,
> I've updated the LilyPond entry, Yay, thanks! (It worked :-)) > but I could not use the suggested entries, they're too long (as I > suspect you know). Yes, of course. It was just a bit tonge-in-cheek (if you need a suggestion, here is one) but in an effort trying to look bigger than ABC :-) > But at least now people will see LilyPond's entry quicker and will > get a little better idea of what it can do. Yes. Now that people see that being real rude pays off, you may expect similar suggestions for Rosegarden and Noteedit too ;-) Just kidding, but I guess these two programs come off a bit cheap too (and they hav lilypond output...) > Jan and Han-wen, my apologies Thanks, apologies gladly accepted. We all have lots of important things that get overlooked way too long. It's just that the recent /. story reminded me that LilyPond has still less visibility than I like to imagine; comments from Linux users saying this was exactly what they had been looking for or even had been thinking of implementing. That makes you wonder, why is LilyPond so invisible, even for Linux users (btw, we have binaries for and users on MacOS X and Windows too.) Looking for Linux and music easily brings one to your linux-music.org site, but that was a bit of a dead end really, as far as finding LilyPond was concerned. So, with your post about updated pages, this seemed a logical first line of attack ;-) > IMO, LilyPond is a 1st-rate application. I'm especially impressed > with the research and dedication shown by its developers Thanks again, Greetings, Jan. -- Jan Nieuwenhuizen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | GNU LilyPond - The music typesetter http://www.xs4all.nl/~jantien | http://www.lilypond.org
