On m�n, 2004-04-12 at 12:56, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote: > Jens M. Andreasen writes: -<snip>- > > compacted: > -<snipped as well>-
> FWIW, I hate to think that the lack of a good suggestion is the > bottleneck (if so, I should have made a better one long ago). Maybe I > don't understand; do you also do content management for the > linux-sound.org site? > No, I am not an editor for any site. My humble suggestistion (for a release note) still lacks what I called for in the first place: What is new and important? Bugfixes? Features? The "catchline" so to say, the line telling people that it might be worthwhile to update their system. What I did with your _summary_ of the project was an attempt to get a better "flow" and perhaps adding a few keywords like "graphical" for an unsuspecting audience. I am still not satisfied with what I wrote. It lacks a sentence near the top indicating "custumor satisfaction" combined with "developer dedication (for perfection?)" > > The LilyPond score engine > > Please do not `compact' GNU away, esp. as the linux-sound.org page > also lists shareware (and currently more favourable at that than > LilyPond, btw.). I deliberatedly "compacted" away GNU, because .. ehrmm .. To me GNU is not so very important. If it is to you, I will of course respect that. It is a non problem. We are watching "Lilja Forever" on telly at the moment, but I will come back to you a little later tonight ... /jens > > Jan. /jens
