On Fri, May 14, 2004 at 12:45:34 -0400, Paul Davis wrote: > >Why rule out XML? It's one of the few widely-used language groups > >that actually sorta meets both those requirements (*fairly* simple and > >*somewhat* human-readable). ;-) > > Reactions to XML can be as strong as your feelings about C++ :) > > Personally, I am fan of both of them, but I don't think that forcing > the use of one of the many XML parsing libraries into a LADSPA > application is a good thing. I think that Steve's simple tuple scheme > can be parsed very easily in C code without any fun and games, and the > file is human readable if not instantly understandable.
*cough* its not my scheme, its a W3C standard. - Steve
