On Sat, 2004-05-15 at 03:23, Joern Nettingsmeier wrote: > sure, libxml2 is huge, but almost everybody will have it in memory > anyway, since it's used by other programs. > > imho, xml *is* very human-readable if the DTD is sane and the output > is pretty-printed. and it's already defined, all the tools are in > place, and changing the DTD is a matter of writing a simple XSLT for > the users to convert their old versions. > > so ++xml.
I agree. For metadata, XML or RDF is where it's at. ++++. :) Taybin
