On Tue, Jul 27, 2004 at 11:34:48AM -0600, martin rumori wrote: > On Tue, Jul 27, 2004 at 12:33:56PM -0400, Paul Davis wrote: > > >The question is, which implementation is best? All I can find is > > >Steve's liblo, libosc++, and the 'official' OSC kit. What are the > > > > afaik, libosc++ just wraps the sdk distributed by stanford. and that > > sdk is just a total nightmare. the 2nd worst code i have ever > > read. use liblo. > > do you mean the sdk distributed by berkeley? if you're speaking about > libOSC++ from stetson university (part of the wiretap project), it > doesn't wrap the berkeley thing. when using the "fraunhofer" branch > from cvs, it comes with some classes wrapping the unix network stuff > (UDP and TCP). > > if you don't need bundles, I'd go with liblo, cause it's really > lightweight.
I agree. Thought its now really only the API thats lightweight, the code is growing a bit :( - Steve
