> Getting off topic here, but there's a little more to it than that. 1 > Syntactic sugared implementation is much much more preferable to 101 > conventions for doing OOP with void pointers. > Things like typesafety, getting rid of macros in favour of inline > functions. The STL is another real reason to use C++ - the closest we have > to a standard for that sort of stuff. UML etc... There are a lot of very > practical reasons for using C++.
Ahhh, I fear an outbreak of the unstoppable language zealot virus is imminent! Once it gets airborne nothing can stop it! Ahh, it's probably already to late... I can hear the sound of eager fingers tapping on keyboards... save yourselves!! ;-) /Robert -- http://spamatica.se/music/
