On Tue, 31 Aug 2004 13:43:31 -0600, martin rumori wrote > On Tue, Aug 31, 2004 at 02:46:13PM -0400, Dave Robillard wrote: > > I was wondering about this the other day - is there no OSC 'standard' > > for how to declare note-ons, offs, etc? > > > > If OSC really is to become a MIDI replacement, there's needs to be an > > explicitly defined standard that says "this is how a note is triggered" > > AFAIK in the beginning it was never meant as a midi replacement, but > should -in opposite to midi- not make any assumptions on the musical > meaning of the data being sent.
so if I'm writing a osc sequencer, is the best plan to leave the mapping open for the user to modify? > however, an "official" way of encapsulating midi in osc would maybe > push especially some commercial developers to osc, but i guess the > CNMAT folks don't want to have it in their official spec. simple midi messages are supported as a type in osc, but you'd have to write your server to pick them up. cheers, dave
