Previously: > All this mentioning of "belief" and "church" to degrade open source > people is no better than me calling you and RME Nazis. Seems to be a > recurring theme that the person who presents the open source position > makes no personal attacks whatsoever, and someone who is okay with > proprietary drivers responds with personal attacks (both suggestively by > you to Marek and directly by Jan to myself). Let's throw the name > calling aside please. Anyway... > > There are very valid technical reasons why a closed piece of hardware is > a POS from a Linux user's perspective.
[Heehee... Anyone else see the irony in this?] So, it's ok for you to imply (in a previous email to Marek) that RME is fascist and (in this email) that their hardware is a POS, but if anyone else says anything defending them, that's a personal attack? > We would like to be able to use RME's hardware to it's full extent. There are a lot of things that I'd like to be able to do that I can't. [SHRUG] There are always other options. Why limit yourself? -Doug
