On Mon, Jan 31, 2005 at 06:53:05AM -0500, Paul Davis wrote: > but anyway, i just wanted to note that tracks don't have to be > considered as this kind of burden at all. when you get down to the > core of it, tracks are a grouping mechanism, that's all.
agreed... > and they > don't group by using time relationships, but signal processing > relationships. Hmm, what then is a "channel"? -- Paul Winkler http://www.slinkp.com
