> You got me! I am a long term buzz user, used it for live gigs, and wrote a keyboard based mixer for it.
oh - you wrote miXo - of course. (i wrote a peer machine or two.) go buzz devs! i think everyone who's ever used buzz for more than a couple of hours wants a new, stable, cross-platform version. (and there are *loads* of re-implementation projects, including at least one linux one.) i even have some semi-formed plans myself... > A lot of time is spent on finding the processing order. But this only > needs to be done once in a while. i'd be very surprised by that (i haven't looked at any code though). surely it's a very light task, computationally? i'm thinking that if the machine network is represented by a tree, just a depth-first search through the tree gets you the right processing order?
