oh - you wrote miXo - of course. (i wrote a peer machine or two.) go buzz devs!
i think everyone who's ever used buzz for more than a couple of hours wants a new, stable, cross-platform version. (and there are *loads* of re-implementation projects, including at least one linux one.) i even have some semi-formed plans myself...
..want to go into more detail?
hmm..., maybe you right. I had something working about 2 years ago -- then called muzz :) -- and that spent most of it's time doing that tree thingy. But it was probably a bad way of doing it in general.. there is alos this thing about inputs and outputs or more general connectors and how to handle the logics behind them..
A lot of time is spent on finding the processing order. But this only needs to be done once in a while.
i'd be very surprised by that (i haven't looked at any code though). surely it's a very light task, computationally? i'm thinking that if the machine network is represented by a tree, just a depth-first search through the tree gets you the right processing order?
mimo
--
Please note that this account is being filtered using anti UCE systems. If you send email to this account make sure that it could not be mistaken as UCE.
