hi arnold, On Tue, Mar 15, 2005 at 09:12:19PM +0100, Arnold Krille wrote: > I had a look into Steve Harris' liblo and libOSC++. The later seems more > appealing to me since I am a C++-Guy.
two years ago, i added the network classes (Inet*) to libOSC++, fixed some bugs, cleaned up a bit... the library was used in different projects (http://listen.gmd.de, http://www.grenzenlosefreiheit.de, plus the wiretap thing of the original libOSC++ developers) and appeared to be stable. BUT: as far as i know, there is not much development ongoing at the moment, and i ever planned some redesign for the whole library (i don't consider using a std::string as container for an osc message as a nice example for object oriented design...), but unfortunetaly there wasn't enough time... just some background information concerning libOSC++. be sure to pick the "fraunhofer" branch if using it. there is a download page at http://libosc.rumori.de but i guess that liblo might be the better choice, it's in vivid development and used by much more projects than libOSC++, plus the clean and rock solid design with the steve harris (R) guarantee... bests, martin
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
