Hi all, <rant> I am sorry but the alsa documentation is poor. I always resort to looking at other peoples applications to see what they have done. A case in point is the alsa sequencer. It does have a nice page which explains just enough to get you going but the api is much larger than this and some of the function documentation is banal to say the least.
The audio stuff is even worse! There is some conceptual documentation which seems very old and I am not sure whether it is up to date. </rant> <caveat> For an open source project that is not used commercially the documentation is amongst the best that I have seen and we all know how difficult it is to find time to spend on this stuff. I have been trying for years but between work, study and actually trying to make some music I have ended up making no contribution (so who am I to talk!). </caveat> sorry but that's my opinion, Kev --- Lee Revell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, 2006-02-28 at 21:49 +0000, Julian Storer > wrote: > > the hostile, undocumented jungle of ALSA > > Please, stop repeating the myth that ALSA is > undocumented. > > http://www.alsa-project.org/documentation.php > http://www.alsa-project.org/alsa-doc/alsa-lib/ > http://www.alsa-project.org/alsa-doc/alsa-lib/examples.html > > Lee > > ___________________________________________________________ To help you stay safe and secure online, we've developed the all new Yahoo! Security Centre. http://uk.security.yahoo.com
