On Mon, 2006-03-13 at 00:23 -0500, Paul wrote: > Are these the threads you are refering to? > > 2.6.X, NPTL, SCHED_FIFO and JACK : > http://lkml.org/lkml/2004/6/30/104
I was looking for the thread(s) referenced in the above message: "Because of the recognition by kernel developers that 2.6 does not perform as well as 2.4+lowlat (the Andrew Morton patches) when it comes to scheduling latency, most audio developers and users have remained with 2.4. Recently however, several brave souls have attempted to test 2.6. The results have been mixed." Lee
