On Mon, 2006-03-13 at 00:34 -0500, Lee Revell wrote: > On Mon, 2006-03-13 at 00:23 -0500, Paul wrote: > > Are these the threads you are refering to? > > > > 2.6.X, NPTL, SCHED_FIFO and JACK : > > http://lkml.org/lkml/2004/6/30/104 > > I was looking for the thread(s) referenced in the above message: > > "Because of the recognition by kernel developers that 2.6 does not > perform as well as 2.4+lowlat (the Andrew Morton patches) when it > comes to scheduling latency, most audio developers and users have > remained with 2.4. Recently however, several brave souls have > attempted to test 2.6. The results have been mixed."
it doesn't exist. this was based on private communication with morton, ingo and a couple of other people.
