On Sat, Apr 22, 2006 at 03:05:18PM -0400, Dave Robillard wrote: > On Sat, 2006-04-22 at 11:56 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > On Sat, Apr 22, 2006 at 02:22:09PM -0400, Dave Robillard wrote: > > > > B) RDF syntax: RDF/Turtle seems a lot more popular in these parts than > > > > RDF/XML. We could mandate Turtle for all LADSPA metadata. > > > > > > Personally I think it's ugly and strange and arbitrary and just weird > > > all around, but whatever. I don't really care. :) > > > > I've not made time for audio software much this past year, so discount me > > if you will, but I agree. I just don't see the point of metadata outside > > the plugin. I just don't get it. > > nonono :) I think metadata outside the plugin is without a doubt the > right way to go. I meant I'm just not a huge fan of the particular > syntax of this Turtle stuff (as opposed to normal well-formed XML). > Mostly because it means we need special tools and who knows what > libraries to deal with it.
That's fine. I still don't get the point of seperating the two.
