On Sat, 2006-04-22 at 21:32 +0100, Steve Harris wrote: > On Sat, Apr 22, 2006 at 03:05:18PM -0400, Dave Robillard wrote: > > nonono :) I think metadata outside the plugin is without a doubt the > > right way to go. I meant I'm just not a huge fan of the particular > > syntax of this Turtle stuff (as opposed to normal well-formed XML). > > Mostly because it means we need special tools and who knows what > > libraries to deal with it. > > you cant usefully read RDF/XML with just an XML parser anyway. It's quite > a lot of work to transform from the XML tree to the RDF graph. > > But yes, Turtle support is less widespeard than RDF/XML, but there are > still Free/Open parsers for every language I can think of (C(++), perl, > java, python, ruby, javascript, etc.)
As long as it's part of the SDK (and the SDK doesn't have ridiculous requirements), I say it's fine. Speaking of SDK, the LADSPA2 SDK should include the above, and a (strict as possible) demolition equivalent - not to mention example plugins that are actually correct :) -DR-
