On Sat, 2006-07-01 at 17:43 +0200, Luis Garrido wrote: > As defined by the FSF, no, it is not free software. If you use the > freebeerian definition, "you don't have to pay its authors to use it", > yes, it is. >
In the Linux world "free software" means free as in speech. No one uses "free software" to refer to closed source software that's given away for free. Lee
