--- Dave Robillard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, 2006-07-05 at 20:41 -0700, Stephen Cameron wrote: > > > > --- Loki Davison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > On 7/6/06, Stephen Cameron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > --- Stephen Cameron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > So, I'm trying to build Smack, which needs Om, which needs > > > > libgnomecanvasmm, > > > > > > which my os (Fedora Core 3) doesn't seem to have, so I found it > > > > > > here: [...] > > I tried to start om_gtk... First it complained about not being able to find > > libgnomecanvasmm.2.6.so.1, so, try (in /usr/lib) > > > > ln -s libgnomecanvasmm-2.6.so.1.0.1 libgnomecanvasmm-2.6.so.1 > > > > Now, it complains... > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ om_gtk > > [StateManager] Unable to open settings file /home/scameron/.omgtkrc > > (om_gtk:2173): libglade-WARNING **: unknown property `focus_on_map' for > > class > `gtkmm__GtkWindow' > > (om_gtk:2173): libglade-WARNING **: unknown property `ellipsize' for class > > `gtkmm__GtkLabel' > > (om_gtk:2173): libglade-WARNING **: unknown property `width_chars' for > > class `gtkmm__GtkLabel' > > (om_gtk:2173): libglade-WARNING **: unknown property `single_line_mode' for > > class > > `gtkmm__GtkLabel' > > (om_gtk:2173): libglade-WARNING **: unknown property `angle' for class > > `gtkmm__GtkLabel' > > (om_gtk:2173): libglade-WARNING **: unknown property `ellipsize' for class > > `gtkmm__GtkLabel' > > > > And finally, it dies with a bunch of crap like this: > > > > ** (om_gtk:2173): CRITICAL **: Gnome::Glade::Xml::get_widget(): > > dynamic_cast<> failed. > > > > So I guess I don't yet have the right libgnomecanvasmm, > > or libglade*so* or something for Fedora Core 3... > > Looks like your GTK/GTKmm version is too old. (Actually since you're > using FC3, I'd bet the farm on it. A while back some crazy idiot > complained about my dependency on a Gtk version that'd been out as a > stable release for almost 2 years because Fedora was so on the > ball... :) ) > > The configure script should have stopped you from building it though, > odd. What version of gtkmm? > > -DR- > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] software]$ rpm -qa | grep gtkmm gtkmm24-2.4.11-1 gtkmm24-devel-2.4.11-1 gtkmm24-docs-2.4.11-1
And just to check in case I built it from source without telling RPM... [EMAIL PROTECTED] software]$ ls -ld /usr/lib/libgtkmm* -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 4127910 May 11 2005 /usr/lib/libgtkmm-2.4.a lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 22 Jun 17 12:14 /usr/lib/libgtkmm-2.4.so -> libgtkmm-2.4.so.1.0.11 lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 22 Jun 17 12:14 /usr/lib/libgtkmm-2.4.so.1 -> libgtkmm-2.4.so.1.0.11 -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 2517840 May 11 2005 /usr/lib/libgtkmm-2.4.so.1.0.11 [EMAIL PROTECTED] software]$ Hmm, looking at gtk.org, I see gtk and friends churn quite a lot. I foresee hours and hours of downloading in my future. Should I grab gtk 2.8 + dependencies? -- steve __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com
