On 7/6/06, Stephen Cameron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
--- Dave Robillard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 2006-07-05 at 20:41 -0700, Stephen Cameron wrote:
> >
> > --- Loki Davison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > On 7/6/06, Stephen Cameron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > > --- Stephen Cameron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > > > So, I'm trying to build Smack, which needs Om, which needs
> > > > libgnomecanvasmm,
> > > > > > which my os (Fedora Core 3) doesn't seem to have, so I found it
here:
[...]
> > I tried to start om_gtk... First it complained about not being able to
find
> > libgnomecanvasmm.2.6.so.1, so, try (in /usr/lib)
> >
> > ln -s libgnomecanvasmm-2.6.so.1.0.1 libgnomecanvasmm-2.6.so.1
> >
> > Now, it complains...
> >
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ om_gtk
> > [StateManager] Unable to open settings file /home/scameron/.omgtkrc
> > (om_gtk:2173): libglade-WARNING **: unknown property `focus_on_map' for
class
> `gtkmm__GtkWindow'
> > (om_gtk:2173): libglade-WARNING **: unknown property `ellipsize' for
class `gtkmm__GtkLabel'
> > (om_gtk:2173): libglade-WARNING **: unknown property `width_chars' for
class `gtkmm__GtkLabel'
> > (om_gtk:2173): libglade-WARNING **: unknown property `single_line_mode'
for class
> > `gtkmm__GtkLabel'
> > (om_gtk:2173): libglade-WARNING **: unknown property `angle' for class
`gtkmm__GtkLabel'
> > (om_gtk:2173): libglade-WARNING **: unknown property `ellipsize' for
class `gtkmm__GtkLabel'
> >
> > And finally, it dies with a bunch of crap like this:
> >
> > ** (om_gtk:2173): CRITICAL **: Gnome::Glade::Xml::get_widget():
dynamic_cast<> failed.
> >
> > So I guess I don't yet have the right libgnomecanvasmm,
> > or libglade*so* or something for Fedora Core 3...
>
> Looks like your GTK/GTKmm version is too old. (Actually since you're
> using FC3, I'd bet the farm on it. A while back some crazy idiot
> complained about my dependency on a Gtk version that'd been out as a
> stable release for almost 2 years because Fedora was so on the
> ball... :) )
>
> The configure script should have stopped you from building it though,
> odd. What version of gtkmm?
>
> -DR-
>
>
[EMAIL PROTECTED] software]$ rpm -qa | grep gtkmm
gtkmm24-2.4.11-1
gtkmm24-devel-2.4.11-1
gtkmm24-docs-2.4.11-1
And just to check in case I built it from source without telling RPM...
[EMAIL PROTECTED] software]$ ls -ld /usr/lib/libgtkmm*
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 4127910 May 11 2005 /usr/lib/libgtkmm-2.4.a
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 22 Jun 17 12:14 /usr/lib/libgtkmm-2.4.so ->
libgtkmm-2.4.so.1.0.11
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 22 Jun 17 12:14 /usr/lib/libgtkmm-2.4.so.1 ->
libgtkmm-2.4.so.1.0.11
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 2517840 May 11 2005 /usr/lib/libgtkmm-2.4.so.1.0.11
[EMAIL PROTECTED] software]$
Hmm, looking at gtk.org, I see gtk and friends churn quite a lot.
I foresee hours and hours of downloading in my future.
Should I grab gtk 2.8 + dependencies?
-- steve
It doesn't take that long to build it all from source, it might be
easier to do some kind of upgrade/update/distupdate of your distro
instead. Can you just change where your apt-get/whatever sources are
pointed at and then upgrade easily. I've done this many times over
many years with mandriva and never had a problem.
Loki
