On Thu, 2006-05-25 at 08:48 -0500, Michael C Thompson wrote: > Do you mean to say that embedded audit_log_user_message() inside a loop > changes it's return code?
Sorry, my explanation probably wasn't clear.
It changes from the first to the second invocation, the first is always
-1 the second is always 0 (on boot, only, after boot the first succeeds
as well).
int i;
for (i=0; i<2; i++) {
rc = audit_log_user_message();
}
> Is that code sample correct?
It is now, yes.
--
James Antill - <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> * What is the penalty for using RHEL without paying?
We subscribe them to memo-list. -- Bill Nottingham
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- Linux-audit mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-audit
