On Thu, 2006-05-25 at 10:22 -0500, Michael C Thompson wrote: > This is interesting, that does seem like we're being denied for the > first attempt of actions against the kernel... you said you've seen this > in the targeted policy? (I've only seen this problem with the MLS policy)
Yes, it's a mostly vanilla FC5 box using targeted policy (and still happens when configured in permissive mode). -- James Antill - <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > * What is the penalty for using RHEL without paying? We subscribe them to memo-list. -- Bill Nottingham
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- Linux-audit mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-audit
