On Friday 24 October 2008 13:08:41 LC Bruzenak wrote:
> Note that the syscall is listed differently.

Interesting.


> This is using the 1.7.7 code (on F9), I have not yet moved over to 1.7.8
> in case it may be fixed there.

Nope...nothing was changed there to fix it. This is the first I'd heard of the 
problem..Can you show me the raw record?

ausearch -ts today -a 10038 --raw

Thanks,
-Steve

--
Linux-audit mailing list
Linux-audit@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-audit

Reply via email to