On Friday 24 October 2008 13:27:49 LC Bruzenak wrote: > So it looks like the architectures interpretation (-i) of the syscall is > where it differs?
Yes, there was a collision between the unset value and the i386 value in the source code. This meant that it when it ran across I386 machines, it thought there was an error looking it up and reverted to looking up the uname machine value as a fallback. Svn commit 155 fixes this. -Steve -- Linux-audit mailing list Linux-audit@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-audit
