On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 03:58:38PM +0100, Catalin Marinas wrote: > On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 03:50:02PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> > What would be better would be if we could get the two trees synced up, > > in this case something like picking the audit change up in the ARMv8 > > tree (or vice versa) seems like it'd be quick and easy since it looks > > like neither tree uses topic branches. > It's not ideal indeed but applying this patch on my tree would break it. > So we need a common base where the audit API is changed, guaranteed not > to be rebased so that I can merge it in the arm64 for-next/core branch. > Do you know which tree commit 3efe33f5d2 is in? I assume some tip > branch? It's the head commit in Eric's audit tree.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
-- Linux-audit mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-audit
