On Mon, 2014-08-11 at 10:09 +0100, Will Deacon wrote: > On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 12:26:42PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote: > > From: Mark Brown <[email protected]> > > > > Commit 3efe33f5d2 (audit: x86: drop arch from __audit_syscall_entry() > > interface) removed the arch parameter from __audit_syscall_entry() and > > updated the only current user in mainline but this breaks the ARMv8 audit > > code that has been added in -next. Fix this by making the equivalent > > update to ARMv8. > > > > Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <[email protected]> > > --- > > arch/arm64/kernel/ptrace.c | 4 ++-- > > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/ptrace.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/ptrace.c > > index 70526cfda056..310842e3d477 100644 > > --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/ptrace.c > > +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/ptrace.c > > @@ -1115,8 +1115,8 @@ asmlinkage int syscall_trace_enter(struct pt_regs > > *regs) > > if (test_thread_flag(TIF_SYSCALL_TRACEPOINT)) > > trace_sys_enter(regs, regs->syscallno); > > > > - audit_syscall_entry(syscall_get_arch(), regs->syscallno, > > - regs->orig_x0, regs->regs[1], regs->regs[2], regs->regs[3]); > > + audit_syscall_entry(regs->syscallno, regs->orig_x0, regs->regs[1], > > + regs->regs[2], regs->regs[3]); > > Eric, Richard: when is 3efe33f5d2 ("audit: x86: drop arch from > __audit_syscall_entry() interface") going to hit mainline? I've been holding > off this fix until the offending commit is merged, but if that's not going > to happen for 3.17, then we probably need to do something else to fix -next.
I think I'm being lazy this window and not oging to send a pull. So I'll pick up this fix as soon as rc1 cuts in my tree. -- Linux-audit mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-audit
