On 2016-10-18 00:35, Richard Guy Briggs wrote:
> On 2016-10-17 18:21, Steve Grubb wrote:
> > On Monday, October 17, 2016 5:19:59 PM EDT Paul Moore wrote:
> > > We haven't merged any of the session ID code into the kernel so
> > > changes are still possible.  The logic for supporting loginuid_set
> > > (UID namespace issues) don't really apply to session IDs so I think we
> > > can drop the sessionid_set part of the API and just use the -1
> > > sentinel.
> > 
> > OK, that's good to hear. I'll fix up and merge the sessionid patch - no 
> > need to 
> > re-send the user space piece.
> 
> userspace patch 2 gets dropped, paches 1 and 3 need rework to not block
> -1 and to remove sessionid_set respectively.  kernel patch 2 gets
> dropped and patch 1 I think needs rework to allow -1.

Kernel patch 1 does not need rework because I properly put the positive
integer check for sessionID in the sessionID_set patch that adds that.

> The test patches also need rework as does the RFE page.
> 
> > -Steve
> 
> - RGB

- RGB

--
Richard Guy Briggs <r...@redhat.com>
Kernel Security Engineering, Base Operating Systems, Red Hat
Remote, Ottawa, Canada
Voice: +1.647.777.2635, Internal: (81) 32635

--
Linux-audit mailing list
Linux-audit@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-audit

Reply via email to