On Tue, Dec 12, 2023 at 04:29:09PM +0100, Christian Brauner wrote: > On Tue, Dec 12, 2023 at 10:16:31AM -0500, Kent Overstreet wrote: > > On Tue, Dec 12, 2023 at 09:56:45AM +0100, Christian Brauner wrote: > > > On Tue, Dec 12, 2023 at 08:32:55AM +0200, Amir Goldstein wrote: > > > > > > STATX_ATTR_INUM_NOT_UNIQUE - it is possible that two files have the > > > > > > same inode number > > > > > > This is just ugly with questionable value. A constant reminder of how > > > broken this is. Exposing the subvolume id also makes this somewhat > > > redundant. > > > > Oh hell no. We finally get a reasonably productive discussion and I wake > > up to you calling things ugly and broken, with no reason or > > justification or any response to the justification that's already been > > given? > > > > Christain, that's not how we do things. Let's not turn what was a > > productive discussion into a trainwreck, OK? > > That's a major aggressive tone for no good reason. And probably not a > good way to convince anyone. I'm also not sure why you're taking a > dislike of this flag as a personal affront.
No, if you're going to show up with comments like that it is entirely called for. Other poeple have been finding ways to contribute to the technical discussion; just calling things "ugly and broken" does not.
